🔗 Share this article Singapore Court Upholds Guilty Verdict for Political Rival Pritam Singh Pritam Singh was present at a hearing in November to appeal against his guilty verdict. In a notable legal ruling, Singapore's main political rival Pritam Singh has lost his appeal against a conviction of lying to a legislative panel. Earlier this year, Singh was fined S$14,000 for two offenses related to his handling of former lawmaker Raeesah Khan, who had admitted to giving false testimony in parliament. During a short hearing before a full public gallery on Friday, the judge declared that the evidence presented upheld Singh's guilty verdict. Reaction from the Accused Singh, who heads the main opposition Workers' Party, expressed that he was "disappointed" with the decision but accepted it "fully and without reservation". He settled his fines at the courthouse after the hearing. "Might as well get it done," he commented to reporters. Despite the conviction, Singh retains his parliamentary seat and stated his intention to keep working for Singaporeans alongside his party members. The Underlying Saga The entire episode originated in 2021 when Raeesah Khan asserted in parliament that she had witnessed police misbehave towards a sexual assault victim. She later confessed her account was untrue, but testified during a official inquiry that party leaders, such as Singh, had instructed her to "stick to the story" even though they were aware it was a lie. Khan has since stepped down from both the party and parliament. She was penalized S$35,000 for perjury and misusing her legislative immunity. Court's Rationale In February, the court ruled that Singh's actions were "highly suggestive" that he did not want Khan to clarify her lie. Singh, who protested his innocence during the entire proceedings, argued that he had wanted to allow Khan space to handle what was a delicate issue. Points Contested During the appeal hearing, Singh's legal counsel contended that the lower court had "ignored crucial pieces of evidence" in its initial judgment. The defense also attempted to question the reliability of Khan and her aides, who served as witnesses. When questioned why Singh appeared to be "doing nothing" to have Khan own up in the weeks following his discovery of her lie, his lawyer explained that he had other pressing commitments to attend to. The prosecution, however, maintained that Singh's lack of action, alongside other evidence, proved he never wanted Khan to come clean. Wider Implications Singh's case is notable as one of the very few criminal convictions against a sitting opposition lawmaker. Observers have previously accused Singapore's government of using the judiciary to pursue its rivals—charges that the government have always rejected. The Workers' Party is the sole rival group in Singapore's present legislature, where it occupies 12 out of 99 seats.