🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.