🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually bore the pressure of her parent’s legacy. Being the child of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the best-known British artists of the early 20th century, the composer’s identity was cloaked in the long shadows of bygone eras.

The First Recording

In recent months, I contemplated these legacies as I made arrangements to record the world premiere recording of Avril’s piano concerto from 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, soulful lyricism, and valiant rhythms, this piece will grant music lovers fascinating insight into how the composer – a wartime composer born in 1903 – imagined her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about shadows. It requires time to adjust, to see shapes as they really are, to distinguish truth from distortion, and I felt hesitant to confront Avril’s past for a period.

I deeply hoped Avril to be a reflection of her father. Partially, this was true. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be heard in several pieces, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the titles of her family’s music to see how he identified as not just a champion of English Romanticism as well as a representative of the Black diaspora.

At this point father and daughter seemed to diverge.

White America assessed the composer by the brilliance of his music rather than the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a white English mother – started to lean into his African roots. At the time the African American poet Paul Laurence Dunbar came to London in 1897, the aspiring artist eagerly sought him out. He composed the poet’s African Romances as a composition and the next year used the poet’s words for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, particularly among African Americans who felt vicarious pride as American society evaluated the composer by the quality of his music instead of the his race.

Activism and Politics

Recognition failed to diminish his activism. During that period, he participated in the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he encountered the African American intellectual this influential figure and saw a variety of discussions, including on the mistreatment of the Black community there. He remained an advocate throughout his life. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights including this intellectual and the educator Washington, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even talked about racial problems with President Theodore Roosevelt while visiting to the presidential residence in the early 1900s. As for his music, reminisced Du Bois, “he wrote his name so high as a composer that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in the early 20th century, in his thirties. Yet how might Samuel have reacted to his daughter’s decision to work in this country in the 1950s?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to apartheid system,” appeared as a heading in the African American magazine Jet magazine. Apartheid “struck me as the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with this policy “in principle” and it “should be allowed to work itself out, guided by good-intentioned people of all races”. If Avril had been more aligned to her father’s politics, or born in segregated America, she could have hesitated about this system. However, existence had sheltered her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a British passport,” she stated, “and the authorities failed to question me about my background.” Thus, with her “fair” appearance (as described), she traveled alongside white society, lifted by their praise for her late father. She presented about her family’s work at the educational institution and led the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in the city, programming the heroic third movement of her concerto, named: “In memory of my Father.” Although a accomplished player on her own, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her concerto. Rather, she always led as the conductor; and so the orchestra of the era played under her baton.

She desired, according to her, she “could introduce a change”. However, by that year, the situation collapsed. Once officials became aware of her Black ancestry, she could no longer stay the country. Her British passport offered no defense, the British high commissioner recommended her departure or risk imprisonment. She returned to England, deeply ashamed as the extent of her naivety became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she expressed. Compounding her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her sudden departure from the country.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these legacies, I sensed a familiar story. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind African-descended soldiers who defended the British in the second world war and made it through but were denied their due compensation. Including those from Windrush,